4.8 Article

Extinction intensity during Ordovician and Cenozoic glaciations explained by cooling and palaeogeography

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 65-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-019-0504-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31772432]
  2. EAR NSF Postdoctoral Fellowship
  3. Leverhulme Grant [DGR01020]
  4. IGCP Project [653]
  5. NERC [NE/K014757/1, NE/I005722/1, NE/I005714/1, NE/P013805/1]
  6. ERC grant 'The Greenhouse Earth System' [340923]
  7. David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A striking feature of the marine fossil record is the variable intensity of extinction during superficially similar climate transitions. Here we combine climate models and species trait simulations to explore the degree to which differing palaeogeographic boundary conditions and differing magnitudes of cooling and glaciation can explain the relative intensity of marine extinction during greenhouse-icehouse transitions in the Late Ordovician and the Cenozoic. Simulations modelled the response of virtual species to cooling climate using a spatially explicit cellular automaton algorithm. We find that palaeogeography alone may be a contributing factor, as identical changes in meridional sea surface temperature gradients caused greater extinction in Late Ordovician simulations than in Cenozoic simulations. Differences in extinction from palaeogeography are significant, but by themselves are insufficient to explain observed differences in extinction intensity. However, when simulations included inferred changes in continental flooding and interval-specific models of sea surface temperature, predicted differences in relative extinction intensity were more consistent with observations from the fossil record. Our results support the hypothesis that intense extinction in the Late Ordovician is partially attributable to exceptionally rapid and severe cooling compared to Cenozoic events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available