4.6 Article

Engineering of a bowl-like Si@rGO architecture for an improved lithium ion battery via a synergistic effect

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab5699

Keywords

lithium ion battery; graphene; silicon; synergistic effect

Funding

  1. project of Ningxia Key RD Plan [2018BEE03013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work we propose a facile template-sacrificing method to prepare bowl-like silicon @reduced graphene oxide (Si@rGO) hybrids as a high-performance anode for lithium ion batteries (LIBs). Uniform Si02 spheres were initially synthesized and wrapped by GO, forming a three-dimensional (3D) skeleton. After reduction and etching, Si nanoparticles were obtained and evenly distributed on the flexible rGO layer, resulting in a bowl-like nanoarchitecture. A benefit of this novel structure is that the volume change of Si can be confined during the charge discharge process. As a result, the Si@rGO anode exhibited a high first discharge capacity of 1890 mAh g-1 with a Coulombic efficiency of 90.79% at a current density of 0.1 A g-1. After 100 cycles, a stable specific capacity of 450 mAh g-1 was achieved, which is twice that of pure Si nanospheres (208 mAh g-1) and rGO (260 mAh g-1). Moreover, when the current density increased to 1 A g-1, the specific capacity of Si@rGO was 100 mAh g-1, whereas it was 34 mAh g-1 for Si nanospheres, demonstrating the advantage of Si@rGO. By analyzing the electrochemical behavior, it is found that the outstanding LIB performance of Si@rGO can be ascribed to the involvement of rGO which constructs the 3D nanoarchitecture that acts as a buffer layer to stabilize the Si and promotes Li+ diffusion as well as the conductivity of the electrodes. This work highlights the significance of the microstructure for lithium ion storage performance of Si-based nanocomposites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available