4.8 Article

Optical Excitation of a Nanoparticle Cu/p-NiO Photocathode Improves Reaction Selectivity for CO2 Reduction in Aqueous Electrolytes

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 2348-2358

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04895

Keywords

artificial photosynthesis; photoelectrochemistry; hot holes; plasmonic photocathode; CO2 reduction

Funding

  1. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0004993]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation through the Early Postdoc Mobility Fellowship [P2EZP2_159101]
  3. Advanced Mobility Fellowship [P300P2_171417]
  4. Resnick Sustainability Institute at the California Institute of Technology
  5. National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship Program [1745301]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P2EZP2_159101, P300P2_171417] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the light-induced modification of catalytic selectivity for photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction in aqueous media using copper (Cu) nanoparticles dispersed onto p-type nickel oxide (p-NiO) photocathodes. Optical excitation of Cu nanoparticles generates hot electrons available for driving CO2 reduction on the Cu surface, while charge separation is accomplished by hot-hole injection from the Cu nanoparticles into the underlying p-NiO support. Photoelectrochemical studies demonstrate that optical excitation of plasmonic Cu/p-NiO photocathodes imparts increased selectivity for CO2 reduction over hydrogen evolution in aqueous electrolytes. Specifically, we observed that plasmondriven CO2 reduction increased the production of carbon monoxide and formate, while simultaneously reducing the evolution of hydrogen. Our results demonstrate an optical route toward steering the selectivity of artificial photosynthetic systems with plasmon-driven photocathodes for photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction in aqueous media.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available