4.8 Article

Strain Effect in Palladium Nanostructures as Nanozymes

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 272-277

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03782

Keywords

Palladium nanostructures; strain effect; enzyme mimic; catalysis; immunoassay

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1834874, CBET-1804525]
  2. University of Central Florida (UCF)
  3. UCF Preeminent Postdoctoral Program
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Catalysis Science Program [DE-SC0018408]
  5. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [1644760]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0018408] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While various effects of physicochemical parameters (e.g., size, facet, composition, and internal structure) on the catalytic efficiency of nanozymes (i.e., nanoscale enzyme mimics) have been studied, the strain effect has never been reported and understood before. Herein, we demonstrate the strain effect in nanozymes by using Pd octahedra and icosahedra with peroxidase-like activities as a model system. Strained Pd icosahedra were found to display 2-fold higher peroxidase-like catalytic efficiency than unstrained Pd octahedra. Theoretical analysis suggests that tensile strain is more beneficial to OH radical (a key intermediate for the catalysis) generation than compressive strain. Pd icosahedra are more active than Pd octahedra because icosahedra amplify the surface strain field. As a proof-of-concept demonstration, the strained Pd icosahedra were applied to an immunoassay of biomarkers, outperforming both unstrained Pd octahedra and natural peroxidases. The findings in this research may serve as a strong foundation to guide the design of high-performance nanozymes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available