4.5 Review

Talaromycosis (Penicilliosis) Due to Talaromyces (Penicillium) marneffei: Insights into the Clinical Trends of a Major Fungal Disease 60 Years After the Discovery of the Pathogen

Journal

MYCOPATHOLOGIA
Volume 184, Issue 6, Pages 709-720

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11046-019-00410-2

Keywords

Talaromycosis; Talaromyces marneffei; Clinical trends; Sixty years; Anniversary

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Talaromycosis (penicilliosis) is a major fungal disease endemic across a narrow band of tropical countries of South and Southeast Asia. The etiologic agent is a thermally dimorphic fungus Talaromyces (Penicillium) marneffei, which was first isolated from a bamboo rat in Vietnam in 1956, but no formal description was published. In 1959, Professor Gabriel Segretain formally described it as a novel species Talaromyces (Penicillium) marneffei, and the human pathogenic potential of the fungus in Mycopathologia. The first natural human case of talaromycosis (penicillosis) was reported in 1973 and involved an American minister with Hodgkin's disease who lived in Southeast Asia. Sixty years after the discovery of the pathogen, talaromycosis caused by T. marneffei is recognized as an important human disease with the potential to cause high mortality in the absence of proper diagnosis and prompt treatment. Talaromycosis remains a significant infectious complication in HIV/AIDS patients and in patients with other immune defects. The disease is being recognized with an increasing frequency well beyond the traditional endemic areas. The natural reservoirs of T. marneffei in wild rodents are well-defined, which links the ecology with the epidemiology of talaromycosis in endemic areas. There is an urgent unmet need for rapid and affordable point-of-care diagnostic tests. We also need more clinical studies to define the best therapeutic options for the management of talaromycosis patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available