4.7 Article

Trend filtering - I. A modern statistical tool for time-domain astronomy and astronomical spectroscopy

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 492, Issue 3, Pages 4005-4018

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa106

Keywords

methods: statistical; techniques: photometric; techniques: spectroscopic

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF), under NASA ATP grant [NNX17AK56G, 80NSSC18K1015]
  3. NSF [AST1615940]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The problem of denoising a 1D signal possessing varying degrees of smoothness is ubiquitous in time-domain astronomy and astronomical spectroscopy. For example, in the time domain, an astronomical object may exhibit a smoothly varying intensity that is occasionally interrupted by abrupt dips or spikes. Likewise, in the spectroscopic setting, a noiseless spectrum typically contains intervals of relative smoothness mixed with localized higher frequency components such as emission peaks and absorption lines, In this work, we present trend filtering, a modern non-parametric statistical tool that yields significant improvements in this broad problem space of denoising spatially heterogeneous signals. When the underlying signal is spatially heterogeneous, trend tittering is superior to any statistical estimator that is a linear combination of the observed data - including kernel smoothers, LOESS, smoothing splines, Gaussian process regression, and many other popular methods. Furthermore, the trend filtering estimate can be computed with practical and scalable efficiency via a specialized convex optimization algorithm, e.g. handling sample sizes of n greater than or similar to 10(7) within a few minutes. In a companion paper, we explicitly demonstrate the broad utility of trend filtering to observational astronomy by carrying out a diverse set of spectroscopic and time-domain analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available