4.7 Article

Blueshifted absorption lines from X-ray reflection in IRAS 13224-3809

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 493, Issue 2, Pages 2518-2522

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa482

Keywords

accretion, accretion discs; black hole physics; galaxies: Seyfert

Funding

  1. ERC Advanced Grant FEEDBACK [340442]
  2. Tsinghua Astrophysics Outstanding Fellowship
  3. Tsinghua Shuimu Scholar Programme
  4. Cambridge Trust
  5. Chinese Scholarship Council [201604100032]
  6. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/R000867/1]
  7. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [834203]
  8. STFC
  9. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [798726]
  10. Spanish State ResearchAgency (AEI) Project [ESP2017-86582-C4-1-R, MDM-2017-0737]
  11. STFC [ST/N004027/1, ST/M005283/2, ST/S000623/1, ST/R000867/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explore a disc origin for the highly blueshifted, variable absorption lines seen in the X-ray spectrum of the narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy IRAS 13224-3809. The blueshift corresponds to a velocity of similar to 0.25c. Such features in other active galactic nuclei are often interpreted as ultrafast outflows. The velocity is of course present in the orbital motions of the inner disc. The absorption lines in IRAS 13224-3809 are best seen when the flux is low and the reflection component of the disc is strong relative to the power-law continuum. The spectra are consistent with a model in which the reflection component passes through a thin, highly ionized absorbing layer at the surface of the inner disc, the blueshifted side of which dominates the flux due to relativistic aberration (the disc inclination is about 70 degrees). No fast outflow need occurs beyond the disc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available