4.7 Article

XMM-Newton campaign on ultraluminous X-ray source NGC 1313 X-1: wind versus state variability

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 492, Issue 4, Pages 4646-4665

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa118

Keywords

accretion, accretion discs; X-rays binaries; X-rays: individual: NGC 1313 X-1

Funding

  1. ESA Member States
  2. USA (NASA)
  3. European Space Agency (ESA) Research Fellowships
  4. STFC
  5. ERC [340442]
  6. European Union's Horizon 2020 Programme under the AHEAD AO5 project [654215]
  7. STFC [1771048, ST/M005283/2, ST/N004027/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) are thought to be powered by neutron stars and black holes accreting beyond the Eddington limit. If the compact object is a black hole or a neutron star with a magnetic field less than or similar to 10(12)G, the accretion disc is expected to thicken and launch powerful winds driven by radiation pressure. Evidence of such winds has been found in ULXs through the high-resolution spectrometers onboard XMM-Newton, but several unknowns remain, such as the geometry and launching mechanism of these winds. In order to better understand MA winds and their link to the accretion regime, we have undertaken a major campaign with XMM-Newton to study the ULX NGC 1313 X-1, which is known to exhibit strong emission and absorption features from a mildly relativistic wind, The new observations show clear changes in the wind with a significantly weakened fast component (0.2c) and the rise of a new wind phase which is cooler and slower (0.06-0.08c). We also detect for the first time variability in the emission lines which indicates an origin within the accretion disc or in the wind, We describe the variability of the wind in the framework of variable super-Eddington accretion rate and discuss a possible geometry for the accretion disc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available