4.7 Article

Improved calculations of electron-ion bremsstrahlung Gaunt factors for astrophysical applications

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 492, Issue 1, Pages 177-194

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3389

Keywords

radiation mechanisms: general; cosmic background radiation; diffuse radiation

Funding

  1. ERC Consolidator Grant CMB-SPEC as part of the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [725456]
  2. Royal Society
  3. STFC [ST/P000649/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electron-ion bremsstrahlung (free-free) emission and absorption occur in many astrophysical plasmas for a wide range of physical conditions. This classical problem has been studied multiple times, and many analytical and numerical approximations exist. However, accurate calculations of the transition from the non-relativistic to the relativistic regime remain sparse. Here we provide a comprehensive study of the free-free Gaunt factors for ions with a low charge (Z <= 10). We compute the Gaunt factor using the expressions for the differential cross-section given by Elwert and Haug (EH) and compare to various limiting cases. We develop a new software package, BRpack, for direct numerical applications. This package uses a combination of pre-computed tables and analytical approximations to efficiently cover a wide range of electron and photon energies, providing a representation of the EH Gaunt factor to better than 0.03 per cent precision for Z <= 2. Our results are compared to those of previous studies highlighting the improvements achieved here. BRpack should be useful in computations of spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave background, radiative transfer problems during reionization or inside galaxy clusters, and the modelling of galactic free-free foregrounds. The developed computational methods can furthermore be extended to higher energies and ion charge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available