4.6 Article

Silica Coated Iron/Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Nano-Platform for T2 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 24, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules24244629

Keywords

nanomaterials; nanochemistry; surface functionalization; MRI; toxicity

Funding

  1. C-NIM through the project (ESR_RS_DF) [000003/2017-006704]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Sciences, Innovation and Universities [RTI2018-098027-B-C22]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growing concern over the toxicity of Gd-based contrast agents used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) motivates the search for less toxic and more effective alternatives. Among these alternatives, iron-iron oxide (Fe@FeOx) core-shell architectures have been long recognized as promising MRI contrast agents while limited information on their engineering is available. Here we report the synthesis of 10 nm large Fe@FeOx nanoparticles, their coating with a 11 nm thick layer of dense silica and functionalization by 5 kDa PEG chains to improve their biocompatibility. The nanomaterials obtained have been characterized by a set of complementary techniques such as infra-red and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopies, transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering and zetametry, and magnetometry. They display hydrodynamic diameters in the 100 nm range, zetapotential values around -30 mV, and magnetization values higher than the reference contrast agent RESOVIST (R). They display no cytotoxicity against 1BR3G and HCT116 cell lines and no hemolytic activity against human red blood cells. Their nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion (NMRD) profiles are typical for nanomaterials of this size and magnetization. They display high r(2) relaxivity values and low r(1) leading to enhanced r(2)/r(1) ratios in comparison with RESOVIST (R). All these data make them promising contrast agents to detect early stage tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available