4.6 Article

Cytotoxic Action of Artemisinin and Scopoletin on Planktonic Forms and on Biofilms of Candida Species

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25030476

Keywords

Candida species; artemisinin; scopoletin; oxidative stress; mature biofilm; antifungal effect

Funding

  1. University of Pecs, Medical School [KA-2018-17, EFOP-3.6.1.-16-2016-00004, EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009]
  2. NKFI-EPR (Hungarian Scientific Research Fund) [K 127944]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the antifungal activities of purified plant metabolites artemisinin (Ar) and scopoletin (Sc) including inhibition, effects on metabolic activities, viability, and oxidative stress on planktonic forms and on preformed biofilms of seven Candida species. The characteristic minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) of Ar and Sc against Candida species ranged from 21.83-142.1 mu g/mL and 67.22-119.4 mu g/mL, respectively. Drug concentrations causing approximate to 10% CFU decrease within 60 min of treatments were also determined (minimum effective concentration, MEC10) using 100-fold higher CFUs than in the case of MIC90 studies. Cytotoxic effects on planktonic and on mature biofilms of Candida species at MEC10 concentrations were further evaluated with fluorescent live/dead discrimination techniques. Candida glabrata, Candida guilliermondii, and Candida parapsilosis were the species most sensitive to Ar and Sc. Ar and Sc were also found to promote the accumulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) by increasing oxidative stress at their respective MEC10 concentrations against the tested planktonic Candida species. Ar and Sc possess dose-dependent antifungal action but the underlying mechanism type (fungistatic and fungicidal) is not clear yet. Our data suggest that Ar and Sc found in herbal plants might have potential usage in the fight against Candida biofilms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available