4.6 Review

Methyltransferase Inhibitors: Competing with, or Exploiting the Bound Cofactor

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 24, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules24244492

Keywords

methyltransferases; S-adenosylmethionine; inhibitors; mechanism of action

Funding

  1. AbbVie [1097737]
  2. Bayer Pharma AG [1097737]
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim [1097737]
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation [1097737]
  5. Eshelman Institute for Innovation [1097737]
  6. Genome Canada through Ontario Genomics Institute [OGI-055]
  7. Innovative Medicines Initiative (EU/EFPIA) [ULTRA-DD grant] [115766]
  8. Janssen
  9. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
  10. MSD
  11. Novartis Pharma AG
  12. Innovation and Science (MRIS)
  13. Pfizer
  14. Sao Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP
  15. Takeda
  16. Wellcome
  17. NSERC [RGPIN-2019-04416, PGSD3]
  18. FAPESP [2018/11011-7, 2019/08603-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein methyltransferases (PMTs) are enzymes involved in epigenetic mechanisms, DNA repair, and other cellular machineries critical to cellular identity and function, and are an important target class in chemical biology and drug discovery. Central to the enzymatic reaction is the transfer of a methyl group from the cofactor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to a substrate protein. Here we review how the essentiality of SAM for catalysis is exploited by chemical inhibitors. Occupying the cofactor binding pocket to compete with SAM can be hindered by the hydrophilic nature of this site, but structural studies of compounds now in the clinic revealed that inhibitors could either occupy juxtaposed pockets to overlap minimally, but sufficiently with the bound cofactor, or induce large conformational remodeling leading to a more druggable binding site. Rather than competing with the cofactor, other inhibitors compete with the substrate and rely on bound SAM, either to allosterically stabilize the substrate binding site, or for direct SAM-inhibitor interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available