4.6 Article

R2-P2 rapid-robotic phosphoproteomics enables multidimensional cell signaling studies

Journal

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20199021

Keywords

DIA; MAPK; mass spectrometry; phosphoproteomics; signaling

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [P2ZHP3_181503]
  2. NIH [R35GM119536, R01AG056359]
  3. Human Frontiers Science Program [RGP0034/2018]
  4. W.M. Keck Foundation
  5. University of Washington's Proteomics Resource [UWPR95794]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P2ZHP3_181503] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent developments in proteomics have enabled signaling studies where > 10,000 phosphosites can be routinely identified and quantified. Yet, current analyses are limited in throughput, reproducibility, and robustness, hampering experiments that involve multiple perturbations, such as those needed to map kinase-substrate relationships, capture pathway crosstalks, and network inference analysis. To address these challenges, we introduce rapid-robotic phosphoproteomics (R2-P2), an end-to-end automated method that uses magnetic particles to process protein extracts to deliver mass spectrometry-ready phosphopeptides. R2-P2 is rapid, robust, versatile, and high-throughput. To showcase the method, we applied it, in combination with data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry, to study signaling dynamics in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in yeast. Our results reveal broad and specific signaling events along the mating, the high-osmolarity glycerol, and the invasive growth branches of the MAPK pathway, with robust phosphorylation of downstream regulatory proteins and transcription factors. Our method facilitates large-scale signaling studies involving hundreds of perturbations opening the door to systems-level studies aiming to capture signaling complexity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available