4.5 Article

Mechanism of reactive magnesia - ground granulated blastfurnace slag (GGBS) soil stabilization

Journal

CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 773-782

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2015-0183

Keywords

soil stabilization; ground granulated blastfurnace slag (GGBS); magnesia; brucite; lime

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. EPSRC [EP/M003159/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reactive magnesia (MgO)-activated ground granulated blastfurnace slag (GGBS), with fixed GGBS dosages but varying MgO/GGBS ratios, was used for stabilization of two soils and compared with brucite (Mg(OH)(2))-activated GGBS and hydrated lime (Ca(OH)(2))-activated GGBS. A range of tests, including unconfined compressive strength testing, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy, was conducted to study the mechanical, chemical, and microstructural properties of the stabilized soils, and then to investigate the mechanism of MgO-GGBS soil stabilization. Results indicate that the Mg(OH)(2) had a minimal activating efficacy for GGBS-stabilized soil, while the reactive MgO yielded a higher activating efficacy than the Ca(OH)(2). The activator-soil reactions in the stabilized soil slowed down the activating reaction rate for GGBS; this effect was less significant in MgO-GGBS-stabilized soil than in Ca(OH)(2)-GGBS-stabilized soil, and hence the GGBS hydration rate in the former was less reduced by the soil than the latter. The Mg2+ and OH-ions produced from MgO dissolution participated in the GGBS hydration reactions without precipitating Mg(OH)(2). The common hydration products in all GGBS-stabilized soils were calcium silicate hydrate-like compounds. Additionally, hydrotalcite and calcite could be produced in MgO-GGBS- and Ca(OH)(2)-GGBS-stabilized soils, respectively, especially with a high activator/GGBS ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available