4.5 Article

Assessment of media reportage of monkeypox in southern Nigeria

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 99, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017985

Keywords

disease outbreak; media reportage; monkeypox; Nigeria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monkeypox is a zoonotic viral disease. Media campaigns are planned to create awareness about the disease. This is because mass media is often the leading source of information and mobilization during important health issues or crisis. The main objective of this study was to assess the media coverage of monkeypox outbreak in Nigeria.The study adopted a cross-sectional survey of residents in Southern Nigeria. A total of 600 respondents were sampled for this study through a multi-stage cluster random sampling technique. Research assistants helped in collecting data from respondents through structured questionnaire. The data collected was analyzed using percentages, mean score, and univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA).Respondents had little or no knowledge of monkeypox virus, its nature, mode of transmission, and prevention mechanism (2.30.918, P=.000). Respondents stated that they learnt about the virus through friends and social institutions instead of media (4.44 +/-.945, P=.006). Media failed to create effective and comprehensive awareness campaigns to mobilize the public (1.86 +/- 1.196, P=.001), while inappropriate and insufficient media programs and lack of funds were blamed for media ineffectiveness (4.18 +/- 1.352, P=.004).The outbreak of monkeypox virus is a public health concern in Nigeria. Media campaigns are planned to raise awareness about the disease; however, these campaigns have not demonstrated effectiveness in changing people's health behavior toward monkeypox. Media, health professionals, and government should synergize to promote a consistent health policy for the control and prevention of monkeypox virus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available