4.6 Article

Adsorption removal of methylene blue onto activated carbon/cellulose biocomposite films: Equilibrium and kinetic studies

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 240, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122221

Keywords

Adsorption; Methylene blue; Activated carbon; Cellulose composite film; Sisal fiber

Funding

  1. 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkom University Fund (Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund) [GCUGR1125622061D]
  2. Science Achievement Scholarship of Thailand (SAST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activated carbon/cellulose composite (ACC) biosorbent films were fabricated via solution casting by combining 1-3% w/v of activated carbon with the cellulose solution which dissolved by lithium chloride/N, N-dimethylacetamide. Both cellulose solution and activated carbon were prepared from sisal fiber. These films were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscope (FTIR), thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA), and X-ray Diffractometer (XRD). The specific surface area of activated carbon was found to be 1165 m(2)/g. The maximum methylene blue adsorption capacity of the ACC film reached 103.66 mg/g with the dye concentration of 100 mg/L, solution pH of 6.9, at 35 degrees C for 24 h. The adsorption data suggested that the isotherm model for the equilibrium process was that of Langmuir model, and the adsorption kinetic was best described by pseudo-second-order model. The effect of initial dye concentration (20-100 mg/L), contact time (0-2,880 min), pH (3-11), and temperature (35-80 degrees C) on adsorption capacity of ACC3 film were also examined. Thermodynamics studies of ACC3 film revealed that the adsorption process was endothermic, spontaneous, and feasible. Therefore, the activated carbon/cellulose composite films can be potentially used as biosorbents to remove dyes from contaminated water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available