4.3 Article

Skin in the game: Epidermal molt as a driver of long-distance migration in whales

Journal

MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 565-594

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mms.12661

Keywords

Antarctica; diatoms; killer whale; Orcinus orca; satellite tagging; skin molt; whale migration

Funding

  1. International Whaling Commission/Southern Ocean Research Partnership
  2. Lindblad Expeditions - National Geographic Conservation Fund
  3. Office of Polar Programs [ANT-0944747, OPP-0338428]
  4. Italian Antarctic Research Programme [2013/AZ1.08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long-distance migration in whales has historically been described as an annual, round-trip movement between high-latitude, summer feeding grounds, and low-latitude, winter breeding areas, but there is no consensus about why whales travel to the tropics to breed. Between January 2009 and February 2016, we satellite-tagged 62 antarctic killer whales (Orcinus orca) of four different ecotypes, of which at least three made short-term (6-8 weeks), long-distance (maximum 11,000 km, round trip), essentially nonstop, migrations to warm waters (SST 20 degrees C-24 degrees C), and back. We previously suggested that antarctic killer whales could conserve body heat in subfreezing (to -1.9 degrees C) waters by reducing blood flow to their skin, but that this might preclude normal (i.e., continuous) epidermal molt, and necessitate periodic trips to warm waters for routine skin maintenance (skin molt migration, SMM). In contrast to the century-old feeding/breeding migration paradigm, but consistent with a feeding/molting hypothesis, the current study provides additional evidence that deferred skin molt could be the main driver of long-distance migration for antarctic killer whales. Furthermore, we argue that for all whales that forage in polar latitudes and migrate to tropical waters, SMM might also allow them to exploit rich prey resources in a physiologically challenging environment and maintain healthy skin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available