4.7 Article

Deformation characteristics and failure mechanism of a reactivated landslide in Leidashi, Sichuan, China, on August 6, 2019: an emergency investigation report

Journal

LANDSLIDES
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 1405-1413

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-020-01367-w

Keywords

Leidashi landslide; Rainfall; Reactivated landslide; Deformation and mechanism

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1505402]
  2. Fund for Creative Research Groups of China [41521002]
  3. Fund for Youth Researcher of the Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province of China [2017JQ0031]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection Independent Research Project [SKLGP2014Z004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

At approximately 2:00 p.m. (Beijing time) on August 6, 2019, the previously controlled Leidashi landslide was reactivated near group 7 of Zhangjiagou village, Jianyang County, Sichuan Province, China. The 2019 Leidashi landslide damaged two main roads and 44 antisliding piles and posed a threat to another main road. This landslide was a reactivation of the 2010 Leidashi landslide and had an accumulation zone of 2.2 x 10(6) m(3). To explore the deformation characteristics and failure mechanism, detailed field investigations, unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry, airborne LiDAR surveys, borehole drilling and inclinometer installation were carried out, and the collected data were analyzed. The results show that the 2019 Leidashi landslide could be divided into main slipping zone and activated zone according to movement state, and the main slipping zone could also be divided into main scarp area, main deposit area, climbing area, uplift area, and local landslide area according to the local movement and geomorphic features. The rapidly increasing landslide thrust caused by short-term but continuous heavy rain caused the failure of the antisliding piles and ultimately reactivated the 2010 landslide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available