4.6 Article

Strategic tillage effects on soil properties and agricultural productivity in the paddies of Southern China

Journal

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 31, Issue 10, Pages 1277-1286

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3519

Keywords

conservation tillage; crop yield; paddy field; soil properties; strategic tillage

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest in China [201503136]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strategic tillage (ST) has been proposed to maintain the benefits and alleviate the negative effects of long-term no-till (NT) management. In this study, the effects of ST on soil properties and yield loss were evaluated for a double-cropped rice (Oryza sativa L.) paddy from 2006 to 2017 in Southern China. Three tillage systems were investigated: long-term NT, continuous rotary tillage (RT), and ST. The results showed that ST effectively solved the problem of long-term NT management: low and unstable bulk density in the soil surface layer. Compared with NT, ST significantly increased the available P (AP) concentration, available K (AK) concentration, the AP storage by 16.55% and the AK storage by 21.37% in the upper 20cm soil. Moreover, the soil pH for NT and ST was lower than RT. ST increased the acidification risk in the 0-5 cm soil layer (pH was 4.84 in 2017) but significantly reduced the risk of yield loss compared to continuous NT. The average yield gap between ST and NT ranged from 408.21kgha(-1) (during 2006-2009) to 1,144.85kgha(-1) (during 2014-2017). ST reduced soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) concentration compared to NT in the 0-5 cm soil layer. However, it did not affect SOC and TN storage, although light fraction organic carbon (LOC) storage for ST was 36.59% lower than that for NT. ST is a promising option for promoting and maintaining the sustainability of rice production in Southern China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available