4.7 Article

A cooperative coevolution algorithm for multi-objective fuzzy distributed hybrid flow shop

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105536

Keywords

Multi-objective fuzzy distributed hybrid flow shop; Fuzzy processing times and due dates; Robustness; Cooperative coevolution algorithm; Estimation of distribution algorithm; Iterated greedy search

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [61525304]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61873328]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With consideration of uncertainty in the distributed manufacturing systems, this paper addresses a multi-objective fuzzy distributed hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with fuzzy processing times and fuzzy due dates. To optimize the fuzzy total tardiness and robustness simultaneously, a cooperative coevolution algorithm with problem-specific strategies is proposed by reasonably combining the estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA) and the iterated greedy (IG) search. In the EDA-mode search, a problem-specific probability model is established to reduce the solution space and a sample mechanism is proposed to generate new individuals. To enhance exploitation, a specific local search is designed to improve performance of non-dominated solutions. Moreover, destruction and reconstruction methods in the IG-mode search are employed for further exploiting better solutions. To balance exploration and exploitation capabilities, a cooperation scheme for mode switching is designed based on the information entropy and the diversity of elite solutions. The effect of the key parameters on the performances of the proposed algorithm is investigated by Taguchi design of experiment method. Comparative results and statistical analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in solving the problem. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available