4.4 Article

A Quality Control Method for Teleseismic P-Wave Receiver Functions

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages 1948-1962

Publisher

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120150347

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [EAR-1053354, EAR-1053248, EAR-1053551]
  2. Lilly Endowment, Inc.
  3. Indiana METACyt Initiative
  4. NSF [CNS-0521433]
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences [1053354] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce a new semiautomated quality control (QC) method for teleseismic P-wave receiver functions consisting of 13 editing procedures. These procedures are categorized into three groups based on (1) deconvolution attributes, (2) characteristics of each receiver function, and (3) the statistical attributes of a station gather. We evaluated the efficacy of individual procedure and combination of multiple procedures by applying them to receiver functions estimated from the EarthScope Ozark-Illinois-Indiana-Kentucky experiment for the Illinois basin area, and 10 years of USArray Transportable Array data for the contiguous United States. The method developed in this study significantly improves the efficiency and accuracy of receiver function QC. Our approach has three useful properties: (1) unlike a manual editing method, our approach produces reproducible results defined by a finite set of tunable parameters; (2) it provides an effective and efficient tool for processing large datasets containing millions of receiver functions; (3) the QC procedures are less dependent on phase similarities comparing to the automated scheme used by the EarthScope Automated Receiver Survey while producing comparable common conversion point stacking images.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available