4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

A prospective, randomized study comparing ultrasound versus fluoroscopic guided femoral arterial access in noncardiac vascular patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages 259-267

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.09.051

Keywords

Femoral artery access; Fluoroscopy; Groin complications; Peripheral vascular disease; Ultrasound-guided femoral artery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of our prospective, single-center, randomized study was to compare the procedural outcomes and complication rates of ultrasound (US)-guided common femoral artery (CFA) access to fluoroscopic guidance in noncardiac procedures. Methods: A total of 635 patients undergoing femoral access for noncardiac diagnostic or interventional procedures were randomized 1:1 to receive either fluoroscopic or US-guided access. The primary end point of the study was successful CFA cannulation. Secondary end points included the first-pass success rate, time to sheath insertion, and accidental venipunctures rate. Both short (24 hours) and midterm (30-90 days postprocedure) access complications were assessed by practitioners blinded to patient randomization. Results: Successful CFA cannulation occurred in 93% of US-guided procedures compared with 86% of fluoroscopyguided access (P = .002). US guidance was associated with increased rates of first-attempt success (74% vs 42%; P <.001), fewer inadvertent venipunctures (2% vs 10 %; P <.001), and decreased median time to cannulation (80 vs 100 seconds; P <.001) compared with fluoroscopy. Rates of complications did not differ at 24 hours (1% vs 1%; P = .99) or 30 to 90 days (2% vs 4%; P = .15) in fluoroscopy vs US-guided access. When access was performed by vascular surgery trainees (residents and fellows), US guidance retained superior rates of successful CFA cannulation compared to fluoroscopy guided access (n = 298; 96% vs 89%; P = .03). Trainees' time to achieve CFA cannulation was similar to attendings' when using US guidance (median, 85 vs 77 seconds; P = .14); however, with fluoroscopy, trainees' times were significantly longer than those of attendings (137 vs 86 seconds; P = .001). Conclusions: In comparison to fluoroscopy, US-guided CFA cannulation had a higher rate of success, faster cannulation, and fewer venipunctures in the absence of increased complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available