4.7 Article

Performance analysis of the infrared thermography method for complex phase diagrams estimation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 143, Issue 5, Pages 3577-3587

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-09333-3

Keywords

Infrared thermography; Phase diagram; DSC; Solid-liquid equilibrium; Eutectic transition

Funding

  1. Interreg Sudoe Programme through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  2. Region Nouvelle Aquitaine [2017-1R10209-13023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The infrared thermography method for estimating phase diagrams is being challenged in terms of its potential, given its simplicity, speed, and relatively low cost. A test campaign is underway to evaluate the impact of experimental parameters on the method's efficiency, focusing on acquisition frequency and heating rate. The study has assessed the accuracy of estimated phase diagrams for three binary systems and identified optimized parameters for further improving the method.
An infrared thermography method for the fast estimation of phase diagrams is progressively being challenged to assess the extent of its potential. Being simple, fast and at relatively low cost, it has successfully been applied to binary systems of organic materials of increasing complexity. A test campaign is now undergoing, aiming at evaluating the influence of experimental parameters on the efficiency of the method. In this work, the impact of the acquisition frequency and the heating rate on the accuracy of the estimated phase diagrams is assessed. Based on the estimation of the phase diagrams of three binary systems of fatty alcohols and fatty acids, the accuracy deviation for phase transitions detection is evaluated in comparison with measurements made by differential scanning calorimetry. Optimized parameters both in terms of heating and acquisition rates are determined to further improve the method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available