4.7 Article

Numerical simulation of transient mixed convection of water-Cu nanofluid in a square cavity with multiple rotating cylinders having harmonic motion

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 143, Issue 6, Pages 4229-4248

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-09379-3

Keywords

Numerical simulation; Mixed convection; Nanofluid; Square cavity; Multiple rotating cylinders

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that heat transfer is influenced by the angular velocity of the cylinder, type of rotation, and nanoparticle concentration. Adding nanoparticles enhances heat transfer rate, but the effect of nanofluids on geometry has reduced for PEC.
Mixed convection in a lid-driven square cavity with different walls temperature in the existence of four rotating cylinders having harmonic motion is simulated numerically for various parameters such as the solid volume fraction (0 <= phi <= 0.03), Richardson number (0.1 <= Ri <= 10) and type of motion for each cylinder. Cu-water nanofluids are considered as fluid inside the enclosure. A comparison of full rotation and harmonic rotation in steady and transient cases was made to get a better understanding of the effect of harmonic rotation. The consequences of this study are obtainable in terms of average and local Nusselt numbers, isotherm contours, streamlines contours, velocity profiles, PEC, and entropy generation profiles. Obtained results show that the heat transfer is dependent on the angular velocity of the cylinder, type of rotation, and the nanoparticle concentration. Adding nanoparticles causes to improve the heat transfer rate. However, the effect of the nanofluids on geometry has decreased for the PEC, except for Ri = 1 and a few particular cases. Also, according to the Nusselt number graphs, we can tell that the harmonic motion in this study did not have a considerable effect on the heat transfer rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available