4.8 Article

Efficient Solar Cells Based on Concerted Companion Dyes Containing Two Complementary Components: An Alternative Approach for Cosensitization

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 142, Issue 11, Pages 5154-5161

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b12675

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2018SHZDZX03]
  2. international cooperation program of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [17520750100]
  3. NSFC [21772041, 21971063, 21702062, 21811530005]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK1616004, 222201717003]
  5. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B160170]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the purpose to achieve panchromatic absorption for constructing efficient dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), the cosensitization approach of using two dyes with complementary absorption has been developed with great success. However, this approach usually requires time-consuming optimization of a number of parameters for controlling the ratio and distribution of the two coadsorbed dyes on TiO2 film, which limits the potentials of this strategy. We herein report an alternative approach for developing efficient DSSCs by designing a class of concerted companion dyes with two complementary dye components linked covalently. Thus, a newly synthesized organic dye Z2 was linked to a recently reported doubly strapped porphyrin dye XW51 through flexible chains with various lengths to afford XW60-XW63. These dyes exhibit excellent absorption and efficiencies in the range of 8.8%-11.7%. Notably, upon coadsorption with chenodeoxycholic acid, XW61 affords an impressive efficiency of 12.4%, a record for iodine electrolyte-based DSSCs, to the best of our knowledge. In addition, these dyes also exhibit the advantages of easy cell fabrication, simple optimization, as well as excellent photostability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available