4.2 Article

Contrast Extravasation is Predictive of Poor Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Anterior Circulation

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104494

Keywords

Contrast extravasation; dual-energy computed tomography; endovascular treatment; hemorrhagic transformation; outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate whether contrast extravasation on dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after endovascular therapy (EVT) are related to hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and poor short-term clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on AIS patients who underwent EVT at Xuanwu hospital between November 2016 and January 2019. DECT was performed on all patients within 24 hours after EVT. Baseline demographic and clinical data were analyzed between patients with and without contrast extravasation and between patients with HT and non-HT, good and poor outcomes at 3 months post-EVT. Results: A total of 166 patients were included in the study with 51 (30.7%) patients experiencing contrast extravasation. Compared to patients without contrast extravasation, patients with contrast extravasation had longer onset to reperfusion time (444.8 minutes versus 374.0 minutes, P = .044) and higher percentages of greater than 3 retriever passes (16.7% versus 31.4%, P = .030). Contrast extravasation was associated with higher risk of HT (P = .038), poor outcome after discharge (P = .030), and longer hospital stay (P = .034). Multivariate analysis showed that contrast extravasation occurrence was an independent factor for HT (OR = 2.150, 95% CI 1.060-4.360, P = .034) and poor short-term outcome (OR = 2.936; 95% CI 1.147-7.518, P = .025). Conclusions: The presence of contrast extravasation within 24 hours of EVT may be associated with higher risks of HT and may be predictive of unfavorable functional outcomes in AIS patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available