4.5 Article

Combining ultrasound-assisted extraction and vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction for the sensitive assessment of aflatoxins in aquaculture fish species

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 43, Issue 7, Pages 1331-1338

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201901129

Keywords

aflatoxins; aquaculture fish; liquid-liquid microextraction; mass spectrometry; ultrasound-assisted extraction

Funding

  1. Secretaria Xeral de Investigacion e Desenvolvemento, Xunta de Galicia [6RC2014/2016, ED431C2018/19, ED431E2018/08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although aflatoxins contamination in feedstuff is a well-known problem, and hence these residues are controlled in poultry products, there is scarce information regarding the presence of these toxic substances in aquaculture fish, facilities that use several feedstuff for fish breeding. A simple, rapid, and sensitive method has been therefore developed for aflatoxins (B1, B2, G1, and G2) assessment in aquaculture products by combining ultrasound probe-assisted extraction and vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction as a sample pretreatment, and high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry as a separation/detection system. Aflatoxins were extracted from fish flesh/liver with a 60:40 acetonitrile/aqueous phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) mixture before preconcentration and clean-up by vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction under the following optimized conditions: 5.0 mL of fish extract at pH 7.0 and NaCl at 0.5% (w/v), 400 mu L of chloroform as extracting solvent, and vortex shaking at 2000 rpm for 1 min. The proposed method is shown to be precise and accurate, and the limit of quantitations (from 0.20 to 1.10 mu g kg(-1)) were lower than the value established by the European Commission Regulation for aflatoxins in foodstuff. Results have shown that fish flesh is free of aflatoxins, but aflatoxins B2 and G1 were quantified in fish liver.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available