4.8 Article

Phosphorous/oxygen co-doped mesoporous carbon bowls as sulfur host for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 450, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227658

Keywords

Heteroatom doping; Carbon bowls; Lithium-sulfur batteries; Confinement of polysulfides; Long cycle life

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772156, 51872144]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180019, BK20171423]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30917015102, 30918014103]
  4. Advanced Research Project of The Professional Leader of Teachers in Jiangsu Higher Vocational Colleges [2019GRFX008]
  5. PAPD of Jiangsu

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-sulfur batteries are particularly attractive due to their high theoretical energy density. Unfortunately, the commercial application of lithium-sulfur batteries is now impeded by the shuttle effect of soluble polysulfides. Herein, we demonstrate that the polysulfides can be effectively confined to the phosphorous/oxygen co-doped mesoporous carbon bowls (P/O-MCB) via the strong electrostatic dipole-dipole interaction. Different from other doping methods, the P2O5 can not only be used as the phosphorous and oxygen sources for co-doping, but also generate enormous pressure difference on the surface of hollow mesoporous carbon sphere under the action of surface tension, leading to the formation of porous bowl-like morphology. Benefiting from the P/O co-doping, high surface area, and unique bowl-like morphology, the S@P/O-MCB electrode delivers an initial capacity of 897 mAh g(-1) at 1C and retains a reversible capacity of 489 mAh g(-1) after 800 cycles. More importantly, the S@P/O-MCB electrode shows an outstanding areal capacity of 5.5 mAh cm(-2) at a high sulfur loading of 5.02 mg cm(-2).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available