4.8 Article

Investigation of lithium-ion battery degradation mechanisms by combining differential voltage analysis and alternating current impedance

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 448, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227575

Keywords

Lithium-ion battery; Degradation mechanisms; Differential voltage analysis (dV/dQ); Impedance; Neutron powder diffraction; Correlation analysis

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Postdoctoral Research Program
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51576142]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [05K16VK2/05K19VK3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

18650-type cells with 2.5 Ah capacity are cycled at both 25 degrees C and 0 degrees C separately, and at 25 degrees C two charging protocols (constant current, and constant current-constant voltage charge) are used. Differential voltage analysis (dV/dQ) and alternating current (AC) impedance are mainly used to investigate battery degradation mechanisms quantitatively. The dV/dQ suggests that active cathode loss and loss of lithium inventory (LLI) are the dominating degradation factors. Significant microcracks are observed in the fatigued cathode particles from the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Crystal structure parameters of selected fatigued batteries at fully charged state are determined by in sins high-resolution neutron powder diffraction. Obvious increases of ohmic resistance and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) resistance occur when the battery capacity fade falls beneath 20%. Continuous charge transfer resistance and Warburg impedance coefficient (W-.eff) increase are observed in the course of cycling. Correlation analysis is performed to bridge the gap between material loss as well as LLI and impedance increase. The increase of the charge transfer resistance is related to both active cathode loss and LLI, and a functional relationship is revealed between LLI and W-.eff regardless of the used cycling protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available