4.8 Article

A novel model predictive control scheme based observer for working conditions and reconditioning monitoring of Zinc-Nickel single flow batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 445, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227282

Keywords

Redox flow batteries; Zinc-nickel single flow batteries; State of charge estimation; Capacity estimation; Reconditioning; Model predictive control; Observer

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR [111/2013/A3]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61673256]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Source [LAPS17018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zinc-nickel single flow batteries (ZNBs) have been demonstrated as a promising alternative to lithium batteries for next generation grid-tied energy storage. However, due to the dendritic growth, the monitoring of working conditions in terms of the state of charge (SoC) and battery capacity is intractable. Although longer lifespan can be achieved through the periodic reconditioning maintenance, there is no mature method to identify the moment of reconditioning. Model predictive control (MPC) is a popular optimization paradigm in the process control. By incorporating the merits of model predictive control, this work presents a novel model predictive control based observer (MPCO) for the working conditions monitoring and reconditioning identification. Strong evidence from substantial experiments and simulations manifests the convergence, robustness, effectiveness and generality of the proposed method. The competitiveness is demonstrated by analytical comparisons against other three estimators. In this regard, the relationships of the proposed observer with other estimators are summarized briefly. At last, an indicator based on the capacity changes is proposed to judge the timing of reconditioning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available