4.6 Article

Proton, Hydroxide Ion, and Oxide Ion Affinities of Closed-Shell Oxides: Importance for the Hydration Reaction and Correlation to Electronic Structure

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages 1277-1284

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07570

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German -Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development [1-1342-302.5/2016]
  2. M-ERA.NET Consortium (Project GOPHyMiCO) [272797]
  3. Stuttgart Supercomputing Center [DEFTD 12939]
  4. UNINETT Sigma2 the National Infrastructure for High-Performance Computing and Data Storage in Norway [NN4604k]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phenomenologically, the enthalpy of the dissociative water incorporation (hydration) of oxides is often found to be more favorable for more basic oxides. In the present work, we investigate proton, hydroxide ion, and oxide ion affinities (PA, HA, and OA) for 19 closed-shell oxides ranging from Li2O and Cs2O to TiO2, SnO2, and SiO2, including also perovskites such as SrTiO3 and BaZrO3 using first-principles defect calculations and thermochemical cycles. The proton affinity is found to play a predominant role in the hydration thermodynamics. The ion affinities are strongly correlated with the oxides' electronic structure (specifically, the ionization potential (IP)). This intriguing correlation between PA and IP holds also for gaseous O species, suggesting a very general origin. Understanding the major factors controlling a metal oxide's susceptibility for dissociative hydration of oxygen vacancies is not only of fundamental interest but also key to the successful development of novel mixed proton-electron conducting oxides for protonic ceramic fuel and electrolyzer cells. In addition to elucidating the hydration reaction, these ion affinities also serve a more general purpose, as they can be used to predict the oxides' tendency to in-/ excorporate a specific ion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available