4.6 Article

Combined Experimental and Theoretical Studies on Planar Chirality of Partially Overlapped C2-Symmetric [3.3](3,9)Dicarbazolophanes

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 124, Issue 10, Pages 2057-2063

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c00286

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cooperative Research Program of Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices [20191331]
  2. JSPS [JP16H06041, JP16KK0111, JP17H05261, JP18K19077, JP18H01964]
  3. Asahi Glass Foundation
  4. Murata Science Foundation
  5. Tonen General Sekiyu Research/Development Encouragement & Scholarship Foundation
  6. Cooperative Research Program of Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Partially overlapped dicarbazolophanes exhibit a planar chirality. In this study, C-2-symmetrical [3.3](3,9)dicarbazolophane derivatives (CZ1-CZ3) have been optically resolved by preparative chiral high-performance liquid chromatography for the first time. In their circular dichroism (CD) spectra, moderate Cotton effects (CEs) were observed for their L-1(b) and L-1(a) transitions (vertical bar Delta epsilon vertical bar = 10-12 and 51-57 M-1 cm(-1), respectively), while intense CEs were notified in their B-1 transitions (vertical bar Delta epsilon vertical bar = 156-216 M-1 cm(-1)), absorption dissymmetry (g(abs)) factors being in orders of 10(-2). Circularly polarized luminescence spectrum was also obtained for cyanamide derivative CZ1, with a comparative luminescence dissymmetry (g(lum)) factor of 0.013. A computational investigation was applied to address the factors for such remarkable chiroptical responses in these dicarbazolophanes of planar chirality. Absolute configurations were unambiguously determined by the comparison of experimental and theoretical CD spectra, which was affirmed by the X-ray crystal structural analysis of enantiomerically pure sulfonamide derivative CZ2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available