4.6 Article

Jones-Wilkins-Lee Unreacted and Reaction Product Equations of State for Overdriven Detonations in Octogen- and Triaminotrinitrobenzene-Based Plastic-Bonded Explosives

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 124, Issue 7, Pages 1399-1408

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b10804

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Jones-Wilkins-Lee (JWL) equation of state (EOS) is used to calculate expansion of detonation reaction products from the chemical equilibrium Chapman-Jouguet (C-J) state to large volumes. Overdriven detonation waves with shock pressures higher than C-J are created by high-velocity impacts or converging detonation waves. Reflection from high-impedance materials, multiple shock impacts, and Mach stem wave interactions creates similar pressures. When overdriven states were first measured experimentally, the original reaction product JWL EOSs predicted excess compression. This problem was resolved by modifying the JWL EOS to produce less compression at high pressures while still correctly calculating expansion from the C-J state. Zeldovich-von Neumann-Doring (ZND) reactive flow models, which include the measured reaction zone momentum, explained experimental observations that lower C-J pressures are required to smoothly connect the C-J state to overdriven states on the product Hugoniot curve. Experimental data on overdriven detonation waves for two octogen 2 (HMX)-based plastic-bonded explosives (PBXs), PBX 9501 and PBX 9404, and for two triaminotrinitrobenzene (TATB)-based PBXs, LX-17 and PBX 9502, are compared to various JWL reaction product EOSs, including ones generated by the CHEETAH chemical equilibrium code. Excellent agreement obtained using JWL EOSs for overdriven shock pressures and densities up to 130 GPa and 3.8 g/cm(3) for both HMX- and TATB-based PBXs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available