4.6 Article

Comparative photosynthetic responses of Norway spruce and Scots pine seedlings to prolonged water deficiency

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111659

Keywords

Photosynthesis; Drought; Photosystem I; Photosystem II; Photosynthetic genes; Oxidative stress

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [16-14-10224]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-14-13015] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stressors of different natures, including drought stress, substantially compromise the ability of plants to effectively and safely utilize light energy. We investigated the influence of water stress on the photosynthetic processes in Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris, two species with contrasting drought sensitivities. Spruce and pine seedlings were exposed to polyethylene glycol 6000-induced water deficits of different intensities and durations. The maintenance of photosystem I (PSI) oxidation in spruce required increased photosynthetic control and led to the increased reduction of the plastoquinone pool, which was not the case in pine seedlings. As a result of increased excitation pressure, photosystem II (PSII) inactivation was observed in spruce plants, whereas in pine, the decreased PSII photochemistry was likely due to sustained non-photochemical quenching. Downregulation of PSII photochemistry and maintenance of PSI in an oxidized state were linked with the prevention of oxidative stress, even under severe water deficit. The decreased photosynthetic pigment content and photosynthetic gene expression suggested the coordinated downregulation of photosynthetic apparatus components under water stress to reduce light energy absorption. In summary, the observed adaptative mechanisms of pine and spruce to water stress may be similar to the well-studied adaptative mechanisms to winter stress, which may indicate the universality of protective mechanisms under various stresses in conifers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available