4.6 Article

Experimental study on the utilization of dune sands as a construction material in the area between Jeddah and Mecca, Western Saudi Arabia

Journal

BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages 1007-1022

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-016-0855-9

Keywords

Dune sands; Natural fine aggregates; Textural characteristics; Concrete; Mortar; Jeddah

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah [93-145-1434]
  2. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the arid continental climatic conditions, about 37 % of Saudi Arabia is covered by desert sands. These sands are mostly dynamic and cause environmental problems. However, these huge quantities of dune sands are considered important natural resources of fine aggregate construction materials. The studied dune sands are predominantly coarse, medium and fine sands with average percentages of 2.4, 19.97 and 76.28 %, respectively, with scarce percents of silt and clay-size particles (around 1 %). The fineness modulus (FM) values of these sands vary from 0.98 to 1.02. Therefore, it is necessary to improve their gradation and textural characters by adding well-graded, crushed fine aggregates to produce an acceptable level of gradation. Mineralogically, the studied dune sands are mainly composed of quartz (88 %), feldspars (9 %) and a negligible amount of carbonates (2.2 %). The workability and compressive strength values of both cement mortar and concrete of the studied dune sands were found to decrease abruptly at dune sand contents[ 50 %. Finally, the studied dune sands are acceptable as fine aggregates for both concrete and mortar when they do not exceed 50 % of the total volume of fine aggregates at a constant mix ratio of 2: 1: 3 (water: cement: fine aggregates) and 1: 2: 4: 6 (water: cement: fine aggregates: coarse aggregates), respectively, for cement mortar and concrete.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available