4.5 Article

Multi-Directional Dynamic Model For Traumatic Brain Injury Detection

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 982-993

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.6340

Keywords

brain injury; concussion; injury criterion; injury prediction

Funding

  1. Child Health Research Institute
  2. Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health
  3. Stanford Clinical and Translational Science Award Program (CTSA) [UL1 TR001085]
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) [3R21EB01761101S1]
  5. David and Lucile Packard Foundation [38454]
  6. Child Health Research Institute - Transdisciplinary Initiatives Program, National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship Program
  7. NIH [UL1 TR000093]
  8. Ford Motor Company through the Ford-Stanford research alliance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given the worldwide adverse impact of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on the human population, its diagnosis and prediction are of utmost importance. Historically, many studies have focused on associating head kinematics to brain injury risk. Recently, there has been a push toward using computationally expensive finite element (FE) models of the brain to create tissue deformation metrics of brain injury. Here, we develop a new brain injury metric, the brain angle metric (BAM), based on the dynamics of a 3 degree-of-freedom lumped parameter brain model. The brain model is built based on the measured natural frequencies of an FE brain model simulated with live human impact data. We show that it can be used to rapidly estimate peak brain strains experienced during head rotational accelerations that cause mild TBI. In our data set, the simplified model correlates with peak principal FE strain (R-2 = 0.82). Further, coronal and axial brain model displacement correlated with fiber-oriented peak strain in the corpus callosum (R-2 = 0.77). Our proposed injury metric BAM uses the maximum angle predicted by our brain model and is compared against a number of existing rotational and translational kinematic injury metrics on a data set of head kinematics from 27 clinically diagnosed injuries and 887 non-injuries. We found that BAM performed comparably to peak angular acceleration, translational acceleration, and angular velocity in classifying injury and non-injury events. Metrics that separated time traces into their directional components had improved model deviance compare with those that combined components into a single time trace magnitude. Our brain model can be used in future work to rapidly approximate the peak strain resulting from mild to moderate head impacts and to quickly assess brain injury risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available