4.6 Article

Cushing's dogged struggle against death: the astonishing case of a patient under cardiac arrest surviving craniopharyngioma surgery

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages 327-336

Publisher

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2019.11.JNS192487

Keywords

Harvey Cushing; Cushing?s legacy; cardiac arrest; craniopharyngioma; history; pituitary surgery; ethics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper analyzes the decision-making process of Dr. Harvey Cushing in dealing with a challenging case, demonstrating his professional dedication and unwavering determination to save lives.
The decisive role Dr. Harvey Cushing (1869?1939) played in medicine goes far beyond the development of neurosurgery. His scientific devotion and commitment to patient care made him an ethical model of strict professionalism. This paper seeks to analyze the decisions Cushing made with the challenging case of HW, an adolescent boy with a craniopharyngioma (CP) involving the third ventricle. Cushing?s earlier failure to successfully remove two similar lesions alerted him to the proximity of HW?s tumor and the hypothalamus. Consequently, he decided to use the chiasm-splitting technique for the first time, with the aim of dissecting the CP-hypothalamus boundaries under direct view. Unexpectedly, HW suffered cardiac arrest during the surgery, but Cushing did not give up. He continued with the operation while his assistants performed resuscitation maneuvers. Such determined and courageous action allowed Cushing to succeed in an apparently hopeless case. Cushing?s unwavering willingness to save patients? lives, even under extreme circumstances, was a fundamental trait defining his identity as a neurosurgeon. Analyzing the way Cushing dealt with HW?s case provides valuable lessons for neurosurgeons today, particularly the importance of assuming proactive attitudes and, in certain cases, making painstaking efforts to overcome daunting situations to save a life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available