4.7 Review

Axonal variants of Guillain-Barre syndrome: an update

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 268, Issue 7, Pages 2402-2419

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09742-2

Keywords

Axonal GBS; Acute motor axonal neuropathy; Acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy; Guillain-Barre syndrome

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0110304]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31600820, 81771257]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Axonal variants of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) have diverse triggers, but key questions remain unanswered and current therapies have limitations. Autoantibody classification and electrophysiology are crucial for differentiation, with emerging technologies facilitating more accurate diagnosis.
Axonal variants of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) mainly include acute motor axonal neuropathy, acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy, and pharyngeal-cervical-brachial weakness. Molecular mimicry of human gangliosides by a pathogen's lipooligosaccharides is a well-established mechanism for Campylobacter jejuni-associated GBS. New triggers of the axonal variants of GBS (axonal GBS), such as Zika virus, hepatitis viruses, intravenous administration of ganglioside, vaccination, and surgery, are being identified. However, the pathogenetic mechanisms of axonal GBS related to antecedent bacterial or viral infections other than Campylobacter jejuni remain unknown. Currently, autoantibody classification and serial electrophysiology are cardinal approaches to differentiate axonal GBS from the prototype of GBS, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Newly developed technologies, including metabolite analysis, peripheral nerve ultrasound, and feature selection via artificial intelligence are facilitating more accurate diagnosis of axonal GBS. Nevertheless, some key issues, such as genetic susceptibilities, remain unanswered and moreover, current therapies bear limitations. Although several therapies have shown considerable benefits to experimental animals, randomized controlled trials are still needed to validate their efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available