4.0 Article

Influence of plaque stiffness on deformation and blood flow patterns in models of stenosis

Journal

BIORHEOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 171-182

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/BIR-14016

Keywords

Biomodel; stenosis; plaque stiffness; PIV

Funding

  1. Tohoku University Global COE program in the World Center of Education and Research for Trans-Disciplinary Flow Dynamics
  2. Japan Science Society [24-604]
  3. MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI Grant [25282140]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25282140] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Blood flow in stenotic vessels strongly influences the progression of vascular diseases. Plaques in stenotic blood vessels vary in stiffness, which influences plaque behavior and deformation by pressure and flow. Concurrent changes in plaque geometry can, in turn, affect blood flow conditions. Thus, simultaneous studies of blood flow and plaque deformation are needed to fully understand these interactions. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify the change of flow conditions attendant to plaque deformation in a model stenotic vessel. METHODS: Three plaques of differing stiffness were constructed on a vessel wall using poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels (PVAH) with defined stiffness to facilitate simultaneous observations of blood flow and plaque deformation. Flow patterns were observed using particle image velocimetry (PIV). RESULTS: Decreases in Reynolds number (Re) with increased plaque deformation suggest that velocity decrease is more critical to establishment of the flow pattern than expansion of the model lumen. Upon exiting the stenosis, the location of the flow reattachment point, shifted further downstream in all models as plaque stiffness decreased and depended on the increase in upstream pressure. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that in addition to luminal area, plaque stiffness should be considered as a measure of the severity of the pathology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available