4.6 Article

Design, synthesis of novel (Z)-2-(3-(4-((3-benzyl-2,4dioxothiazolidin-5-ylidene)methyl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl) phenoxy)-N-arylacetamide derivatives: Evaluation of cytotoxic activity and molecular docking studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
Volume 1202, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.127300

Keywords

Pyrazole; 2,4-Thiazolidinedione (TZD); N-aryl acetamide; Knoevenagel condensation; Cytotoxic activity

Funding

  1. UGC, New Delhi
  2. OU-DST PURSE-II [60/2018-2019]
  3. SAP program, Department of Chemistry, Osmania University, Hyderabad

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In an attempt to discover potential cytotoxic agents, a series of novel (Z)-2-(3-(4-((3-benzyl-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-5- ylidene)methyl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl) phenoxy)-N-arylacetamide derivatives 11a-n were synthesized in varied steps with acceptable reaction procedures with good yields and characterized by H-1 NMR, C-13 NMR, IR and ESI-MS spectra. All the novel synthesized derivatives were assessed for their cytotoxic activity against human breast cell line (MCF-7) with different concentration of 0.625 mu M, 1.25 mu M, 2.5 mu M, 5 mu M and 10 mu M respectively. Biological evaluation assay results were displayed in terms of percentage of cell viability reduction and IC50 values. Most of the screened derivatives demonstrated moderate to promising cytotoxic activity. Some of the derivatives, particularly compound 11d and 11n have shown promising cytotoxic activity with IC50 values 0.604 mM and 0.665 mu M compared to standard drug cisplatin and compounds 11a, 11e and 11g also have shown considerable cytotoxic activity and the rest of the derivatives have shown moderate activity. Furthermore, molecular docking calculations and ADME properties of the synthesized molecules are in effective compliance with the cytotoxic evaluation results. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available