4.7 Article

Mussel-/diatom-inspired silicified membrane for high-efficiency water remediation

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 597, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117753

Keywords

Membrane interface hydrophilization; Biomimetic silicification; Water remediation; Antifouling; Stability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878062]
  2. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (Harbin Institute of Technology) [QA201814]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water purification polymeric membranes are critical for defending water safety and mitigating water crisis stress. They are hampered by membrane hydrophobicity for undesirable filtration performance and troublesome fouling issues. Membrane interface hydrophilization with good hydmphilicity and well-behaved adhesion are highly desired. Here, inspired by bio-protein adhesives and silicified diatom shells, a facile one-step biomimetic silicification method by tannic acid and 3-glycidyloxypropyltrimethoxysilane was explored at ambient conditions. The silicification method is green and cost-effective. The as-decorated membranes boosted hydrophilicity with outstanding rigid test tolerance. The silicification conditions could be regulated by resultant surface chemistry. The hydrophilized microfiltration membrane realized cyclable oily emulsion purification with flux over 2580 L m(-2) h(-1) and oil repulsion over 99.2%. It also demonstrates outstanding repulsion to crude oil. The as-decorated ultrafiltration membrane displayed an improved protein interception (BSA interception above 94.1%, water flux about 424 L m(-2) h(-1)) and antifouling (73.2% enhancement) capacity. The as-presented biomimetic silicification hydrophilization strategy could potentially promote the development of high-performance water purification membranes and efficient energy-water nexus system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available