4.7 Article

Zeolitic-imidazolate-framework filled hierarchical porous nanofiber membrane for air cleaning

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 594, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117467

Keywords

Metal-organic framework; Hierarchical porous; Nanofiber membrane; Air filtration; Sulfur dioxide

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1510202, 21878148]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0204000]
  3. Jiangsu Province Scientific Supporting Project [BK20170046]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M642234]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Severe environmental impact caused by particulate matters (PM) and chemical gaseous pollutants (SO2, NOx, VOCs) has become a global atmospheric issue. Seeking an effective way for both PM removal and other pollutants is urgent and remains a challenge. Herein, we introduced a zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-67) trapin polystyrene hierarchical porous nanofiber membrane (ZIF-67/PS HPNFM) for both PM and SO2 filtration. By controlling the hierarchical porous structure we achieve highly-effective and multi-functional air cleaning membrane that has remarkably low resistance. The macropores interwoven by nanofibers offer high gas permeance of 1489 m(3) m(-2) h(-1) kPa(-1) which ensure a low pressure drop of 91 Pa. Meanwhile, the filled ZIF-67 enhanced the PM capture so that the ZIF-67/PS HPNFM showed a very high PM (< 0.3 mu m) removal efficiency of 99.921%. The mesopores in each nanofiber provided the gas permeating channels that direct SO2 to ZIF-67. Further, the micropores from ZIF-67 dramatically enhanced the surface area (236 m(2) g(-1)) and porosity (0.259 cm(3) g(-1)) which resulted in a good SO2 adsorption capacity (1362 mg g(-1)) at room temperature and humidity of 55%. The hierarchical porous structure membrane with multifunction provides a new concept for synergistic removal of various air contaminants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available