4.7 Article

The emergence of subgenotype ON-1 of Human orthopneumovirus type A in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A new episode of the virus epidemiological dynamic

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 8, Pages 1133-1140

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25643

Keywords

lower respiratory tract infections; molecular epidemiology; ON-1; phylogenetic analysis; RSV

Categories

Funding

  1. NSTIP [14-MED809-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lower respiratory tract infections caused by Human orthopneumovirus are still a threat to the pediatric population worldwide. To date, the molecular epidemiology of the virus in Saudi Arabia has not been adequately charted. In this study, a total of 205 nasopharyngeal aspirate samples were collected from hospitalized children with lower respiratory tract symptoms during the winter seasons of 2014/15 and 2015/16. Human orthopneumovirus was detected in 89 (43.4%) samples, of which 56 (27.3%) were positive for type A and 33 (16.1%) were positive for type B viruses. The fragment that spans the two hypervariable regions (HVR1 and HVR2) of the G gene of Human orthopneumovirus A was amplified and sequenced. Sequence and phylogenetic analyses have revealed a genotype shift from NA1 to ON-1, which was prevalent during the winter seasons of 2007/08 and 2008/09. Based on the intergenotypic p-distance values, ON-1 was reclassified as a subgenotype of the most predominant genotype GA2. Three conserved N-glycosylation sites were observed in the HVR2 of Saudi ON-1 strains. The presence of a 23 amino acid duplicated region in ON-1 strains resulted in a higher number of O-glycosylation sites as compared to other genotypes. The data presented in this report outlined the replacement of NA1 and NA2 subgenotypes in Saudi Arabia with ON-1 within 7 to 8 years. The continuous evolution of Human orthopneumovirus through point mutations and nucleotide duplication may explain its ability to cause recurrent infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available