4.5 Article

Surface Integrity of Ni-Rich NiTi Shape Memory Alloy at Optimized Level of Wire Electric Discharge Machining Parameters

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE
Volume 28, Issue 12, Pages 7663-7675

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-019-04477-2

Keywords

optimization; RSM; shape memory alloy; surface integrity aspects; WEDM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concern of this experimental work is to study the surface integrity aspects such as surface morphology, three-dimensional surface topography, recast layer, phase analysis, and micro-hardness for Ni55.95Ti44.05 shape memory alloy at the optimized level of wire electric discharge machining parameters. A mathematical model was developed for surface roughness and material removal rate considering servo voltage, pulse on time, wire tension, wire feed rate, and pulse off time using response surface methodology technique. In order to obtain the optimized parameters, multi-objective optimization technique grey relation analysis was utilized. The adequacy of the developed model was also checked by analysis of variance. At optimal parameters setting, i.e., pulse on time 123 mu s, pulse off time 58 mu s, servo voltage 50 V, wire tension 3 N, and wire feed rate 5 m/min, maximum material removal rate (8.223 mm(3)/min) and minimum surface roughness (1.93 mu m) were achieved. Surface characteristics of machined surface divulge the presence of discharge craters, debris, molten droplets, micro-voids, spherical nodules, and cracks. A recast layer of thickness 19 mu m with approximately 21% of foreign elements was deposited on the machined surface at optimized parameters, whereas the micro-hardness of the outer machined surface was found to be increased approximately 1.98 times as compared to micro-hardness of bulk material. X-ray diffraction analysis shows the presence of the following compounds on the machined surface NiTi, Ni4Ti3, Ti4O3, Cu5Zn8, Ni(TiO3), and NiZn.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available