4.6 Article

SOD activity of new copper II complexes with ligands derived from pyridoxal and toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans

Journal

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 204, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2019.110950

Keywords

Copper(II) complexes; Superoxide dismutase activity; Pyridoxal; Hydrazides; Caenorhabditis elegans

Funding

  1. CNPq - Edital CMCTIC/CNPq [28/2018, 424514/2018-4, 12/2016/Proc, 303011/2016-5]
  2. CNPq [28/2018, 409150/2018-5]
  3. FAPERGS [02/2017]
  4. CAPES-PROEX [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work presents the synthesis, characterization of copper(II) complexes (C1-C6) and the potential of these compounds to mimic the catalytic activity of the enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD). The copper(II)complexes were obtained by reaction between the aldol condensation between substituted aromatic hydrazides and aromatic aldehydes (salicylic aldehyde and pyridoxal hydrochloride), forming two new ligands (L1 to L6), resulting in new dimeric dicopper (II) complexes (C1 and C2), new three monomeric Cu(II )derivatives (C3, C4 and C6) and a polymeric complex (C5). The Cu(II )complexes were fully characterized by X-ray diffraction, spectroscopic and electrochemical analysis. Subsequently, Cu-II derivatives were evaluated for their antioxidant activities, using the NBT (Nitro blue tetrazolium chloride) photoreduction methodology. After evaluating the antioxidant activity in vitro, it was observed that the best inhibition rates of the superoxide ion are associated to the C4 and C5 complexes. Computational analysis via molecular docking and quantum chemical calculation (Fukui map) offered a molecular level explanation on the biological activity of Cu(II)( )complexes. Additionally, cytotoxicity of C1-C6 was tested in the first time in vivo in nematodes Caenorhabditis elegans, corroborating with the results identified for C4 and C5.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available