4.7 Article

Relative Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccines Among the United States Elderly, 2018-2019

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 222, Issue 2, Pages 278-287

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa080

Keywords

cell-cultured vaccine; high-dose vaccine; influenza vaccine; relative vaccine effectiveness; vaccine effectiveness

Funding

  1. FDA, SafeRx Project, a joint initiative of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
  2. FDA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Studies among individuals ages >= 65 years have found a moderately higher relative vaccine effectiveness (RVE) for the high-dose (HD) influenza vaccine compared with standard-dose (SD) products for most seasons. Studies during the A(H3N2)-dominated 2017-2018 season showed slightly higher RVE for the cell-cultured vaccine compared with SD egg-based vaccines. We investigated the RVE of influenza vaccines among Medicare beneficiaries ages >= 65 years during the 2018-2019 season. Methods. This is a retrospective cohort study using inverse probability of treatment weighting and Poisson regression to evaluate RVE in preventing influenza hospital encounters. Results. Among 12 777 214 beneficiaries, the egg-based adjuvanted (RVE, 7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9%-11.4%) and HD (RVE, 4.9%; 95% CI, 1.7%-8.1%) vaccines were marginally more effective than the egg-based quadrivalent vaccines. The cell-cultured quadrivalent vaccine was not significantly more effective than the egg-based quadrivalent vaccine (RVE, 2.5%; 95% CI, -2.4% to 7.3%). Conclusions. We did not find major effectiveness differences between licensed vaccines used among the elderly during the 2018-2019 season. Consistent with prior research, we found that the egg-based adjuvanted and HD vaccines were slightly more effective than the egg-based quadrivalent vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available