4.7 Article

De Novo Genotypic Heterogeneity in the UL56 Region in Cytomegalovirus-Infected Tissues: Implications for Primary Letermovir Resistance

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 221, Issue 9, Pages 1480-1487

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz642

Keywords

cytomegalovirus; genotype; letermovir; resistance; tissues

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Government (Ministry of Education) [NRF-2017R1D1A1B03032844]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Letermovir, an inhibitor of unique long (UL)56-encoded cytomegalovirus (CMV)-terminase, shows prophylactic effects with low-grade adverse events in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Despite few case reports on acquired letermovir resistance, the frequency of de novo amino acid (A.A.) changes encoded by UL56 in CMV-infected tissues is unclear. Methods. We analyzed CMV UL56 sequences between the conserved region IV and variable region I in 175 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues obtained from 147 patients showing positive CMV immunochemical staining between November 2012 and October 2016. Nucleotides 552-1330 of the open reading frame of UL56 were amplified with 5 primers and sequenced by a dideoxy fluorescence-based cycle. Results. Six (3.4%) tissues from 4 (2.7%) patients harbored A.A. substitutions. There were no known potent resistant mutations. However, we found C325Y in 2 tissues from 1 patient, along with other mutations. Four novel A.A. changes, which have not been observed in previous in vitro experiments, were identified (T244I, S301T, G312V, and M434I). Most (9 of 11, 81.8%) of the A.A. changes occurred between the codons 301 and 325 present between the conserved regions V and VI. Conclusions. The treatment difficulties associated with letermovir resistance in a clinical setting need to be verified before its widespread use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available