4.7 Article

Flood susceptibility mapping using convolutional neural network frameworks

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 582, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124482

Keywords

Flood susceptibility mapping; Convolution neural network; Classification; Feature extraction; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61271408, 41602362]
  2. International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [115242KYSB20170022, 201906860029]
  3. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flood is a very destructive natural disaster in the world, which seriously threatens the safety of human life and property. In this paper, the most popular convolutional neural network (CNN) is introduced to assess flood susceptibility in Shangyou County, China. The main contributions of this study are summarized as follows. First, the CNN technique is used for flood susceptibility mapping through two different CNN classification and feature extraction frameworks. Second, three data presentation methods are designed in the CNN architecture to fit the two proposed frameworks. To construct the proposed CNN-based methods, 13 flood triggering factors related to historical flood events in the study area were prepared. The performance of these CNN-based methods was evaluated using several objective criteria in comparison to the conventional support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Experiments results demonstrate that all the CNN-based methods can produce more reliable and practical flood susceptibility maps. For example, the proposed CNN-based classifiers were 0.022-0.054 higher than SVM in terms of area under the curve (AUC). In addition, in the classification process, CNN-based feature extraction can effectively improve the prediction capability of SVM by 0.021-0.051 in terms of AUC. Therefore, the proposed CNN frameworks can help mitigate and manage floods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available