4.7 Article

Optimization of preparation technology for modified coal fly ash and its adsorption properties for Cd2+

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 392, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122461

Keywords

Coal fly ash; Alkaline modified; Cd2+; Adsorption; Optimization; Coal fly ash; Alkaline modified; Cd2+; Adsorption; Optimization

Funding

  1. Key Laboratory of Original Agro-environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Ministry of Agriculture/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-environment [17nybcdgj-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work focused on preparation a novel adsorbent from coal fly ash (CFA) and solid alkali (NaOH) by low temperature roasting method. The modification parameters (mass ratio, calcination time and temperature) were specifically studied and optimized. The adsorption experiment results indicated that, the adsorption amounts of Cd2+ were enhanced with the decreasing mass ratio of CFA and NaOH, and the adsorption amounts of Cd2+ were 32.44, 31.66, 38.5 and 79.85 mg/g at the mass ratio (CFA/NaOH) of 5:5, 5:6, 5:7 and 5:8, respectively. The higher modification temperature was not conducive to the removal of Cd2+, as the adsorption capacities of Cd2+ calculated were 62.42, 69.53 and 41.73 mg/g at the reaction temperature of 250, 300 and 400 degrees C. Interestingly, the modification time slightly effects on the adsorption ability of materials. According to the results, the optimum modification condition for preparing adsorbents were CFA/NaOH mass ratio of 5:8 and calcined at 300 degrees C for 3 h. Moreover, the influence of pH, ionic strength and Glycine concentration on Cd2+ uptake were also investigated. The kinetic, adsorption isotherm and thermodynamics models were applied to investigate the adsorption mechanism, which indicated that the adsorption process was better fitted by Langmuir and pseudo-second-order models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available