4.7 Article

Enhanced phosphorus availability and heavy metal removal by chlorination during sewage sludge pyrolysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 382, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121110

Keywords

Sludge biochar; Chlorination; Pyrolysis; Heavy metal removal; Phosphorus availability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21707063]
  2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Integrated Surface Water-Groundwater Pollution Control

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing attention has been paid on the application of sewage sludge-derived biochar as soil amendments, but is always limited by heavy metals. This study conducted experiments on heavy metal removal by adding chlorinating agents (PVC, NaCl, MgCl2, CaCl2) during sludge pyrolysis. The chlorides addition can largely remove heavy metals by achieving the highest removal efficiency with dosage of 80 g(Cl)/kg(dry sludge) at 700 degrees C. The most effective removal effect was observed for Zn, Mn, Cu and Pb, with removal efficiency from 37.44% to 99.45%, 5.24% to 93.64%, 9.11% to 86.15% and 16.57% to 90.75%, respectively for the sludge before and after chlorination. Furthermore, the P-solubility in neutral ammonium citrate (P nec ) was enhanced after chlorination and the maximum P-solubility can be obtained at 700 degrees C for each series. After 700 degrees C pyrolysis, the P-solubility was significantly increased from 40.08% of the sludge biochar to 72.07%, 74.05%, 74.00% and 76.57% of the biochar obtained after adding PVC, NaCl, CaCl2, and MgCl2, respectively. The highest P-solubility was observed in samples with MgCl2 due to the formation of Mg-3(PO4)(2) . This study proposed a novel method to use the sludge biochar as potential P-fertilizer with effective heavy metal removal, finally achieving a waste-to-resource strategy for integrated management of sewage sludge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available